Book Review: The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist by Dani Rodrik
Reveiwed by Kate Saffin
The School of Economics and Political Science - April 14, 2012
Dani Rodrik is Professor of Political Economy at Harvard University
and has been a vocal critic for over a decade of what he sees as the
unbridled tide of globalisation present in today’s worldwide economy.
Rodrik’s 1997 book Has Globalization Gone Too Far? was hailed as one of the best economics books of that decade by Business Week, and was a forerunner to The Globalisation Paradox, in
which Rodrik sets out the perils of financial globalization without any
constraints, as he says perfectly evidenced by the most recent
financial crisis and the rapid domino effect that it had around the
world.
He cautions that the crisis was predictable and that economists –
both academic and practising – became blind to obvious pitfalls because
they believed too strongly in their own invented narrative: “markets are
efficient, financial innovation transfers risk to those best able to
bear it, self-regulation works best, and government intervention is
ineffective and harmful”.
Rodrik believes in the power of
globalisation to lift millions out of poverty and create widespread good
but only if it is done more thoughtfully. The paradox is essentially
that in order for globalisation to bring proper economic benefits that
are broadly distributed throughout society, national democracies need to
be strengthened and international rules need to be in place, that
protect all players, whilst still allowing for manoeuvrability and
enterprise. This is in contrast to the oft-cited doctrine that the true
powers of globalisation can only be harnessed when there is a complete
free flow of capital with minimal regulation.
READ MORE...
No comments:
Post a Comment