The New York Times -
ON
June 20, 2003, employees of the Union Pacific Railroad faced a
difficult decision as a runaway train headed toward downtown Los
Angeles: Should they divert the train to a side track, knowing it would
derail and hit homes in the less populated city of Commerce, Calif.? Did
the moral imperative to minimize overall harm outweigh the moral
imperative not to intentionally harm an innocent suburb?
They chose to divert the train, which injured 13 people, including three children who were sent to the hospital.
This
extreme real-life situation resembles a philosophical thought
experiment known as the trolley problem, which was designed to probe our
moral commitments. It goes like this: Imagine you are standing on a
footbridge over rail tracks. An approaching trolley is about to kill
five people farther down the tracks. The only way to stop it is to push a
large man off the footbridge and onto the tracks below. This will save
the five people but kill the man. (It will not help if you jump; you are
not large enough.) Do you push him?
No comments:
Post a Comment