The New York Times - FEB. 28, 2014
BILL GATES, in his foundation’s annual letter,
declared that “the terms ‘developing countries’ and ‘developed
countries’ have outlived their usefulness.” He’s right. If we want to
understand the modern global economy, we need a better vocabulary.
Mr.
Gates was making a point about improvements in income and gross
domestic product; unfortunately, these formal measures generate
categories that tend to obscure obvious distinctions. Only when
employing a crude “development” binary could anyone lump Mozambique and
Mexico together.
It’s
tough to pick a satisfying replacement. Talk of first, second and third
worlds is passé, and it’s hard to bear the Dickensian awkwardness of
“industrialized nations.” Forget, too, the more recent jargon about the
“global south” and “global north.” It makes little sense to counterpose
poor countries with “the West” when many of the biggest economic success
stories in the past few decades have come from the East.
Read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment