The global working class is starting to unite -- and that's a good thing.
BY Charles Kenny
Foreign Policy - JANUARY 21, 2014
The
inscription on Karl Marx's
tombstone in London's Highgate Cemetery
reads, "Workers of all lands, unite." Of course, it hasn't quite ended up that
way. As much buzz as the global Occupy movement managed to produce in a few
short months, the silence is deafening now. And it's not often that you hear of
shop workers in Detroit making common cause with their Chinese brethren in
Dalian to stick it to the boss man. Indeed, as global multinational companies
have eaten away at labor's bargaining power, the factory workers of the rich
world have become some of the least keen on helping out their fellow wage
laborers in poor countries. But there's a school of thought -- and no, it's not
just from the few remaining Trotskyite professors at the New School -- that
envisions a type of global class politics making a comeback. If so, it might be
time for global elites to start trembling. Sure, it doesn't sound quite as
threatening as the original call to arms, but a new specter may soon be
haunting the world's 1 percent: middle-class activism.
Karl Marx saw an apocalyptic
logic to the class struggle. The battle of the vast mass against a small
plutocracy had an inevitable conclusion: Workers 1, Rich Guys 0. Marx argued
that the revolutionary proletarian impulse was also a fundamentally global
one -- that working classes would be united across countries and oceans by their
shared experience of crushing poverty and the soullessness of factory life. At
the time Marx was writing, the idea that poor people were pretty similar across
countries -- or at least would be soon -- was eminently reasonable. According to
World Bank economist Branko Milanovic, when The Communist
Manifesto was written in 1848, most income inequality at
the global level was driven by class differences within countries. Although
some countries were clearly richer than others, what counted as an income to
make a man rich or condemn him to poverty in England would have translated
pretty neatly to France, the United States, even Argentina.
Read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment