Naked Capitalism - April 3, 2014
By Yves Smith
Yves here. The best review so far on Thomas Piketty’s new book Capital in the Twentieth Century is by Jamie Galbraith,
and we’ve featured it in Links. But the article itself is long and a
bit wonky, so Pilkington’s recap is a useful distillation of Galbraith’s
piece.
By Philip Pilkington, a writer and research assistant at
Kingston University in London. You can follow him on Twitter
@pilkingtonphil. Originally published at Fixing the Economists
I’ve been waiting for this for some time but now Jamie Galbraith has come out and provided an extensive discussion of Thomas Piketty’s new book Capital in the Twentieth Century.
While I haven’t yet read Piketty’s book its difficult not to have heard
about it given how much of a response it is getting among economics
types.
The moment the hype started I thought that something was amiss. In
2012 Galbraith and his team published an extensive empirical
investigation of income distribution using new datasets that they
constructed. Beyond the interview I did with Galbraith
and a few other articles and the like the release of the study didn’t
get much play among economist types. The reason should be obvious:
whereas Galbraith arrived at heterodox conclusions, Piketty’s are mostly
orthodox.
Read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment