By Nate Silver
FIVE THIRTY EIGHT ECONOMICS - May 1, 2015
When I was a freshman at the University of Chicago in 1996, I heard the same thing again and again: Do not leave the boundaries of Hyde Park. Do not go north of 47th Street. Do not go south of 61st Street. Do not go west of Cottage Grove Avenue. 1
These boundaries were fairly explicit, almost to the point of being
an official university policy. The campus police department was not
committed to protecting students beyond the area,2 and the campus safety brochure advised
students not to use the “El” train stops just a couple of blocks beyond
them unless “traveling in groups and during the daytime.”
What usually wasn’t said — on a campus that brags about the diversity of its urban setting but where only about 5 percent of students are black — was that the neighborhoods beyond these boundaries were overwhelmingly black and poor. The U. of C. has, for many decades,
treated Hyde Park as its “fortress on the South Side,” and its legacy
of trying to keep its students within the neighborhood — and the black
residents of surrounding communities out — has left its mark on Chicago.
On Dustin Cable’s interactive “Dot Map”
of racial residency patterns, Hyde Park appears as an island of blue
and red dots — meaning, mostly white and Asian students and residents —
in contrast to Chicago’s almost uniformly black South Side, designated
in green dots. Washington Park, the neighborhood just to Hyde Park’s
west, is 97 percent black3. Woodlawn — the neighborhood on the other side of 60th Street — is 87 percent black.
READ MORE....
No comments:
Post a Comment