Washington's opposition to the AIIB is rooted in the idea that spending on infrastructure does not alleviate poverty unless governance is improved
By Hilton Root
CAIXIN ONLINE - 04.03.2015
In late March, on a small island in southern China, the liberal world
order, the basis of global economic prosperity since the end of World
War II, was tested. At the annual Boao Forum for Asia, China was
asserting its case to lead a new development bank, the Asian
Infrastructure Investment Bank, which will rival the U.S.-led World Bank
and Japanese-led Asian Development Bank (ADB). Speaking to the
delegates, Xi Jinping explicitly announced China's political motivation
"to build a new regional order."
The United States refuses to join and has asked its allies to put
policy first and insist that a new bank enunciate its commitment to the
explicit principles of good governance before soliciting membership.
Nevertheless, the U.S. resolve to maintain institutional cohesion around
shared principles is going unheeded. Eyeing potential commercial
opportunities, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy are among
the many allies that have joined the Chinese initiative.
But is the Chinese concept good development policy?
The advantages of adding infrastructural capacity, more railways,
ports, roads, telcos, is irrefutable. Throughout developing Asia access
to transportation, water, electricity and other utilities is inequitable
and of poor quality. The developing regions of East Asia need more
infrastructure, lots of it and more than any current configuration of
financial institutions can supply.
READ MORE.....
No comments:
Post a Comment