Despite all the recent WWI analogies, Sino-American relations may more closely resemble an earlier time.
By Tim Roberts
The Diplomats - February 07, 2014
Imperial Germany’s competition with Britain, culminating in military
conflict in 1914, is a common analogy among observers of the
Sino-American relationship today. They warn
how a rising power once came to blows with an established hegemon. But
there could be a better analogy of rivals, whose pragmatic relationship
did not lead to war. The Anglo-American relationship through the Civil
War in many ways resembles the evolving Sino-American relationship now.
Obviously there are differences between the Anglo-American
relationship 175 years ago and Sino-American relations today. Then there
was no United Nations, no Kyoto Protocol, no World Trade Organization,
and no Nobel Peace Prizes. If there was any international “law” it was
largely the British Empire’s declarations for a balance of power in
Europe, equal European access to colonial development of Africa and
Asia, a cap on European colonial possessions in the Americas (tacitly
ensuring the U.S. Monroe Doctrine), and an end to the African slave
trade. The British Navy enforced these policies. The world today is more
multilateral than in the mid-nineteenth century.
Read more.....
No comments:
Post a Comment