Turkey says it wants to be a model for democracy in the Middle East. But so far its actions lag behind its achievements.
BY GAMZE COŞKUN
Foreign Policy
NOVEMBER 21, 2012
The Arab Spring has prompted a lot of talk
about Turkey's possible role as a model. Turkey's recent economic success and
the relative liberality of its institutions have made it a point of reference
to many in the Middle East.
Let's leave aside for the moment the issue of
whether the Arabs really need a role model, since they're perfectly capable of establishing
their own system without copying either Turkey or the West. Being a model is
not only about having a well-functioning democratic system but also having the
capacity to be able to foster it domestically and internationally and to be
able to put rhetoric and aims into action. Does Turkey really offer a useful
template for democratic values and institution building?
First of all, it's worth taking a look at
Turkey's capabilities. While there has been considerable discussion of Turkey's
role in the region, a look at the country's diplomatic, economic, and
soft-power resources is sobering. Though Turkey has 25 diplomatic missions in
the Arab countries, at last count only six of the 135 staffers in these
missions actually spoke Arabic. Needless to say, this says a lot about Turkey's
ability -- and perhaps its willingness -- to develop wide-ranging diplomatic
relationships throughout the MENA (Middle East and North Africa). Furthermore,
although Turkey's trade relations with the region are frequently cited, most of
its exports are based on natural resources and low-technology (56 percent),
followed by medium-technology goods (40.5 percent). Its share of high-tech
exports to the region remains low (3.5 percent in 2010). This suggests that Turkey
is not necessarily one of the main economic competitors in the region, a factor
that will tend to limit its influence.
To read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment