The 1 percent hollowed out the middle class and our industrial base. And Washington just let it happen
By Edward McClelland
Salon.com - Friday, Sep 20, 2013
I know I’m dating myself by writing this, but I remember the middle class.
I
grew up in an automaking town in the 1970s, when it was still possible
for a high school graduate — or even a high school dropout — to get a
job on an assembly line and earn more money than a high school teacher.
“I
had this student,” my history teacher once told me, “a real
chucklehead. Just refused to study. Dropped out of school, a year or so
later, he came back to see me. He pointed out the window at a brand-new
Camaro and said, ‘That’s my car.’ Meanwhile, I was driving a beat-up
station wagon. I think he was an electrician’s assistant or something.
He handed light bulbs to an electrician.”
In our neighbors’
driveways, in their living rooms, in their backyards, I saw the evidence
of prosperity distributed equally among the social classes: speedboats,
Corvette Stingrays, waterbeds, snowmobiles, motorcycles, hunting
rifles, RVs, CB radios. I’ve always believed that the ’70s are
remembered as the Decade That Taste Forgot because they were a time when
people without culture or education had the money to not only indulge
their passions, but flaunt them in front of the entire nation. It was an
era, to use the title of a 1975 sociological study of a Wisconsin
tavern, of blue-collar aristocrats.
That all began to change in
the 1980s. The recession at the beginning of that decade – America’s
first Great Recession – was the beginning of the end for the bourgeois
proletariat. Steelworkers showed up for first shift to find padlocks on
mill gates. Autoworkers were laid off for years. The lucky ones were
transferred to plants far from home. The unlucky never built another
car.
When I was growing up, it was assumed that America’s shared
prosperity was the natural endpoint of our economy’s development, that
capitalism had produced the workers paradise to which Communism
unsuccessfully aspired. Now, with the perspective of 40 years, it’s
obvious that the nonstop economic expansion that lasted from the end of
World War II to the Arab oil embargo of 1973 was a historical fluke,
made possible by the fact that the United States was the only country to
emerge from that war with its industrial capacity intact.
Unfortunately, the middle class – especially the blue-collar middle
class – is also starting to look like a fluke, an interlude between
Gilded Ages that more closely reflect the way most societies structure
themselves economically. For the majority of human history – and in the
majority of countries today – there have been only two classes:
aristocracy and peasantry. It’s an order in which the many toil for
subsistence wages to provide luxuries for the few. Twentieth century
America temporarily escaped this stratification, but now, as statistics
on economic inequality demonstrate, we’re slipping back in that
direction. Between 1970 and today, the share of the nation’s income that
went to the middle class – households earning two-thirds to double the
national median – fell from 62 percent to 45 percent. Last year, the
wealthiest 1 percent took in 19 percent of America’s income – their
highest share since 1928. It’s as though the New Deal and the modern
labor movement never happened.
To read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment