How do you judge an academic? Can you compare scholars from different
fields on equal footing? Whose work had the bigger impact down field,
Albert Einstein or Ada Lovelace?
These seem like impossible questions to answer, but as reported by Nature, a team of information scientists out of Indiana University, Bloomington, think they’ve found a way. And, according to them, the most influential scholar is… Karl Marx.
Here’s how they got there:
Scientists are already regularly judged—by grant agencies, by tenure
committees, by others—on their citation rate. But, some scientific
disciplines are way bigger than others, which means it’s not really fair
to compare theoretical physicists to, say, drug researchers, on
citation count alone.
The Indiana University researchers, say Nature, tried to
take this into account. First they looked to see if a scientist had not
just one big study, but lots of work that was all cited regularly
(rolled up in a measure called the h-index).
Then, they compared the scientist’s score against others in their own
respective field. This let them calculate how much of a stand-out they
were.
No comments:
Post a Comment