By Mark Vorpahl
Occupy.com | Op-Ed - Tuesday, 12 November 2013
In one of comedian Chris Rock's routines, he observes: "You know what
that means when someone pays you a minimum wage? You know what your
boss is trying to say? 'Hey, if I could pay you less, I would, but it’s
against the law.'"
The humor works because, like the boy who cried "the king has no
clothes,” Rock is stating something obvious which mostly goes unspoken:
that if it wasn't for such laws as the minimum wage, established to
appease the militant mass workers' struggles in the 1930s, bosses would
reduce workers' wages and benefits to near zero.
This is because workers' wages come, naturally, at the expense of
their bosses' profits. Since bosses are in business to make as much
profit as possible, they are compelled to cheat their workers out of
every dime their labor creates, within the limits of the law.
Reforms such as the minimum wage benefit workers by forcing
businesses to pay them more, but the political system behind such laws
is not a neutral arbitrator in worker/boss conflicts. Its purpose is to
secure and enhance the power of big business, even if that means
occasionally curbing business owners' greed in order to maintain stable,
profitable commercial relations.
The Shrinking Minimum Wage
In the absence of a mass workers' movement that can challenge
corporate dominance, power gets measured in dollars -- and nowhere is
this clearer than our political system. Pulling the strings behind the
puppet show of two-party politics are the 1%, who have amassed such a
concentration of wealth that they have squeezed out any effective
opposition -- not to mention consideration for the interests of the vast
majority of voters.
To read more...
No comments:
Post a Comment